Perceptive. He'll go far. And not just because he's already had this other successful career dealing with actual customers (which should be a stronger prerequisite for becoming a commercial developer than any of that comp sci stuff).
A friend is embarking upon a conversion MSc into the wonderful world of software development. He's become interested in the currently en vogue paradigms of programming, their relationships and future. It seems to him (he says) that OO is very much about standing around a whiteboard with your friends, sipping a tall skinny latte while your pizza goes cold. And by contrast functional programming is like sitting alone, crying into your gin with your head held in your hands over some very, very, hard maths.
This Daily WTF reminded me of a less than glorious episode from my programming past. At a company that shall remain namless (and doesn't exist anymore) I was working on a C++ library to form part of a much larger application.
One fine day a colleague came stomping (that's the only verb that suits) over to my desk and boldly announced that "your code has crashed my compiler". Somewhat alarmed at this I scurried (yes, scurried) back to his desk. "Look" he said, and did a little cvs/make dance. Lo and behold, when the compiler got to my code indeed it fell to silently chugging away. "See," he resumed, "it's crashed."
"No," I said, "it's just compiling."
"So where," he asked, "are the messages?"
"What messages?" I replied. He scrolled the xterm up a bit.
"These. All the warnings and stuff"
"Doesn't generate any," I said.
He boggled. "What, have you found some way of turning them off?"
"No," I said, "I just wrote the code so that it doesn't generate any warnings."
He boggled some more. "Why," he eventually managed to gasp, "would you bother doing that?"
I didn't last long there. It was best for all concerend, really.
The old wiki page on Golden Hammers has popped up on reddit. One commentator suggests that a golden hammer seems to be the same as a silver bullet.
Probably. But I find the two phrases suggestive when placed side-by-side. To me, it seems as if a golden hammer is a tool that's very familiar, simple to apply, and words best on things within striking distance: everyday problems. All these screws sticking out all over, bam, bam, bam. A golden hammer is something we already have, and it worked great lots of time before, so lets carry on using it for whatever comes next.
A silver bullet, on the other hand, seems like something that is directed in from the outside. It is a projectile, the sender has no control over it once launched. The silver bullet is new and alien. It requires complex tooling to make it work. It is deployed against hairy monsters that jump out at you. Nothing ever worked on them before, maybe the silver bullet will?
A golden hammer, then, would be the over-applied old tool of a worker who doesn't learn new ones. The silver bullet is the disengaged outsider's agent of violent change.
I love having new distinctions to play with.